Patchwork [v7,16/27] KVM: arm64: Factor out core register ID enumeration

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Dave Martin
Date March 29, 2019, 1 p.m.
Message ID <1553864452-15080-17-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/761171/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Dave Martin - March 29, 2019, 1 p.m.
In preparation for adding logic to filter out some KVM_REG_ARM_CORE
registers from the KVM_GET_REG_LIST output, this patch factors out
the core register enumeration into a separate function and rebuilds
num_core_regs() on top of it.

This may be a little more expensive (depending on how good a job
the compiler does of specialising the code), but KVM_GET_REG_LIST
is not a hot path.

This will make it easier to consolidate ID filtering code in one
place.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Tested-by: zhang.lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>

---

Changes since v5:

 * New patch.

   This reimplements part of the separately-posted patch "KVM: arm64:
   Factor out KVM_GET_REG_LIST core register enumeration", minus aspects
   that potentially break the ABI.

   As a result, the opportunity to truly consolidate all the ID reg
   filtering in one place is deliberately left on the floor, for now.
   This will be addressed in a separate series later on.
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 3e38eb2..a391a61 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/stddef.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
@@ -194,9 +195,28 @@  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static int kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user *uindices)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	int n = 0;
+	const u64 core_reg = KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32); i++) {
+		if (uindices) {
+			if (put_user(core_reg | i, uindices))
+				return -EFAULT;
+			uindices++;
+		}
+
+		n++;
+	}
+
+	return n;
+}
+
 static unsigned long num_core_regs(void)
 {
-	return sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32);
+	return kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(NULL);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -276,15 +296,12 @@  unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 {
-	unsigned int i;
-	const u64 core_reg = KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE;
 	int ret;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32); i++) {
-		if (put_user(core_reg | i, uindices))
-			return -EFAULT;
-		uindices++;
-	}
+	ret = kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(uindices);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	uindices += ret;
 
 	ret = kvm_arm_copy_fw_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
 	if (ret)