Patchwork [v2,3/4] x86/platform/UV: use efi_enabled() instead of test_bit()

mail settings
Submitter Hedi Berriche
Date Feb. 7, 2019, 4:22 a.m.
Message ID <>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/720387/
State New
Headers show


Hedi Berriche - Feb. 7, 2019, 4:22 a.m.
Use ad hoc efi_enabled() instead of fiddling with test_bit().

Cleanup, no functional changes.

Cc: Russ Anderson <>
Cc: Mike Travis <>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <>
Cc: Steve Wahl <>
Signed-off-by: Hedi Berriche <>
 arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
index cd05af157763..8bace0ca9e57 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/bios_uv.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@  s64 uv_bios_call(enum uv_bios_cmd which, u64 a1, u64 a2, u64 a3, u64 a4, u64 a5)
 	 * If EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is set, we need to fall back to using our old EFI
 	 * callback method, which uses efi_call() directly, with the kernel page tables:
-	if (unlikely(test_bit(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP, &efi.flags)))
+	if (unlikely(efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP)))
 		ret = efi_call((void *)__va(tab->function), (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
 		ret = efi_call_virt_pointer(tab, function, (u64)which, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);